Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have till February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to depart and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually don’t consider it so much a deal. I think it’s a demand to resign with an unclear guarantee that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for up to 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not explain it as a buyout. I believe that’s an extremely misleading term to use in this circumstance. When you consider a buyout, there’s normally some sort of composed arrangement or a to provide an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your recommendations, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe care. There are no warranties consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for specific is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some category of worker who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that may this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most cautious because leaving earlier than planned can have major consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who do not wish to go back to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is really generously providing to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: referall.us It just – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work really tough to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes due to the fact that there are no assurances. And these are people who like their task. They enjoy the objective of the firm. They strive. And today, they’re dealing with really difficult options, especially if they’re remote. I indicate, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal difficulties just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be honest, is so unprecedented that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not aware of any authority that exists right now for OPM to buy agencies to give this number of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is quite perhaps setting the stage for challenges due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually significantly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: somalibidders.com Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website regards to usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for additional information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text might not remain in its final type and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.